Feed aggregator

This week marks five years since the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Economic reality changed almost overnight as the virus spread, and despite a very strong recovery, we are still dealing with some of the consequences. Inflation is still on its way back down from pandemic highs.

To take a look back at some of the enduring economic marks left by the pandemic, “Marketplace Morning Report” Sabri Ben-Achour was joined by Pavlina Tcherneva, president of the Levy Economics Institute at Bard College where she’s also an economics professor. The following is an edited transcript of their conversation.

Sabri Ben-Achour: We did get new and expanded forms of government relief and service during the pandemic. Did any of that stick? Or really did that change at all what Americans expect from their government?

Pavlina Tcherneva: We were able to really mobilize the public resources. And I’m talking about financial resources, and research capabilities, administrative structures. We were able to mobilize them to, you know, develop obviously vaccines. We offered telehealth, we offered various other subsidies. And so I think people understood, for a brief moment, that this was possible. And those protections then disappeared, and they were left to struggle with high health care bills and the kind of difficulty to access health care, as one example.

Ben-Achour: There were and are differences of opinions on the effectiveness of some of the things the government did. For example, relief payments. On the one hand, they provided much needed relief to people. On the other, people say that they contributed to inflation. I’m wondering what mistakes did we or could we learn from from an economic perspective?

Tcherneva: I mean, I think the first lesson is that income support relief payments clearly can be dispersed on short order, but I think what it also demonstrated is that just income support doesn’t really address the fundamental structural issues that we’re discussing here. Income support doesn’t increase the minimum wage. You have to have minimum wage legislation to do that. You have to have legislation to provide benefits for working people. And I think this is where we missed an opportunity to think very deeply about transforming the labor market. There was, I think, a missed opportunity on extending the expanded child tax credits. We could have tried different types of student debt relief when student debt cancellation didn’t work. We’ve seen homelessness increase — you know, thinking about housing issues. And so I think that income was the expedient thing to do, but it was not a transformative thing to do.

Ben-Achour: Well, if there is, you know, political disagreement about whether to keep some of the measures we took to help people along through the pandemic, are we better or worse prepared for knowing what to do the next time something crazy like this happens?

Tcherneva: I hope we’re better prepared. I mean, one important lesson is that if we’re faced with a major crisis, we need to be looking to the fiscal side. We need to be looking to Congress for swift action, and it is the public sector that can mobilize the resources. Clearly, we’re working in a political environment that is quite antithetical to increasing public investments, an environment in which public administrative structures that acted very effectively during the COVID pandemic are being under attack. So we have a lot of work ahead of us. But in terms of economic policy, I would say a lesson would be the fiscal arm is the one that can act, and it needs to act perhaps in a more surgical way to improve in a long-term manner the problems in the labor market, increasing minimum wage, providing essential benefits, dealing substantively with the accelerating health care costs, child poverty. These are the sorts of things that we saw even during the last election. I think these are the lessons that we can be learning going forward.

Sony has used AI to imbue a PlayStation character with the ability to converse with a player, The Verge reports. A source shared a since-deleted video with the publication featuring an AI-powered version of Aloy from Horizon Forbidden West. Engadget viewed the video before it was pulled. 

In the demo, Aloy can hold a conversation with voice prompts during gameplay, and respond to questions with a synthesized voice and facial movements. It starts with a delay from Aloy, after being asked how they are, followed by the character stating they are "managing alright, just dealing with a sore throat," a weird aside. The technology appears to work both within a controlled demo as well as the entire Horizon Forbidden West game. During gameplay, Aloy answers queries about where they are and what the time is, though Aloy states it's afternoon and hot, rather than a specific time. After the game, Aloy returns to interview mode and gives an overview of what just happened. 

The creepy bit, at least to me, came when Aloy is prompted to say goodbye to the audience and thank everyone. The character does, but the robotic voice creates an eerie vibe. 

Sony used a few different models to create this prototype, including GPT-4 and Llama 3 for powering decision making and conversation, along with OpenAI's Whisper allows for speech-to-text. In the demo, Sony reportedly said it is using its own Emotional Voice Synthesis (EVS) system and Mockingbird technology for speech generation and audio to face animation, two technologies that the company hasn't talked about much yet publicly.

NVIDIA and Microsoft have been working on similar technology. The former has used ACE, its suite of technology for enlivening game characters with AI, to create AI-powered conversations for NPCs. Engadget’s senior editor, Devindra Hardawar, was far from impressed, stating in January, that “seeing several NVIDIA ACE demos back-to-back made me genuinely sick to my stomach.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/sony-demos-an-ai-powered-playstation-character-133052902.html?src=rss

Lena Raine, who composed most of the music for the beloved indie game Celeste, has released a concept album for Earthblade. Extremely OK Games announced in 2022 that it was developing Earthblade as its next project after Celeste, but it ultimately cancelled the project in January this year. Raine wrote in the description of EARTHBLADE ~ Across the Bounds of Fate that she cobbled together "every bit of music [she'd] written for the game to the point of its cancellation in order to tell [her] own version of it." While there's no game to dictate the tracks' sequence for the album, Raine said she arranged them "into the emotional arc of their progression, much like [she] would for any soundtrack release."

The composer cited older animation and film as inspiration for the album, such as the synths and live strings in Joe Hisaishi’s score for Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind, as well as Yoko Kanno's use of saxophones and percussives for Cowboy Bebop and Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex. In addition to Celeste, Raine also wrote music for the soundtracks of Minecraft and Guild Wars 2.

Earthblade was supposed to be a 2D exploration-action game, wherein you play as Névoa, an "enigmatic child of Fate" who's returning to Earth. "Noel and I…began to reflect on how the game has felt for us to work on day-to-day, and realized that it has been a struggle for a long time," studio director Maddy Thorson said when Extremely OK cancelled the game. Programmer Noel Berry and Thorson parted ways with Extremely OK co-founder Pedro Medeiros last year, but Thorson said in her announcement of Earthblade's cancellation that Medeiros and the team for his new project "aren't the enemy."

You can now purchase the album for $7 from Bandcamp.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/lena-raine-released-a-soundtrack-for-celeste-studios-cancelled-follow-up-game-earthblade-120029888.html?src=rss

At the risk of repeating myself from Engadget's MacBook Air M1, M2 and M3 reviews: The M4-equipped MacBook Air is a nearly flawless ultraportable. Even better, it now starts at $999, which is $100 less than before. While I'd still like to see more ports and a faster screen refresh rate, the MacBook Air still remains heads and shoulders above the competition. And when companies try to one-up Apple, as ASUS did with its 2.2-pound Zenbook A14, it only proves how much better-designed Apple's hardware actually is.

It's easy to take the MacBook Air for granted, since its design hasn't changed since the M2 model arrived in 2022. It's still a remarkable machine today, one that's fast, light and well-built. The only major downside is that there's a bit of a learning curve for Windows users jumping ship for the first time. But aside from that, the MacBook Air is a no-brainer purchase if you're looking for a new ultraportable.

Hardware

Once again, both the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air models feel impressively thin (measuring 0.44 inches thick) and light, weighing in at 2.7 pounds and 3.2 pounds, respectively. Last year, I noted "Its unibody aluminum case feels as smooth a river stone yet as sturdy as a boulder. It's a computer I simply love to touch." All of that remains true with the M4 models.

In fact, it's even more impressive that Apple holds such a commanding design lead when competitors have had a chance to catch up. As much as we like the Surface Laptop, XPS 13 and ASUS' Zenbook S14, Apple still maintains a level of polish that PC makers can't quite match. The MacBook Air's case feels more luxurious than the rest, its keyboard is a dream to type on and it has one of the best trackpads around. (And before you go calling me an Apple fanboy, I'm still primarily a Windows desktop user.)

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

Apple's M4 chip — which sports a 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU and 16-core Neural Engine (or what you'd call an NPU in a PC) — is the main upgrade with these new MacBook Airs. It's also worth noting that the base $999 13-inch model has a slightly slower 8-core GPU, which will slightly hamper gaming and media creation performance. Aside from a new Sky Blue option, there aren't any physical design changes. Apple also upgraded the webcam to a new 12-megapixel Center Stage shooter, which could be particularly helpful if you want to show off the contents of your desk. (More on that later.)

The 13-inch MacBook Air features a 13.6-inch Liquid Retina Display, which practically feels like a 14-inch screen, while the larger model has a 15.3-inch display. They're still limited to 60Hz — an annoyance since plenty of PC ultraportables are shipping with faster and smoother screens — but they're impressive displays nevertheless, with support for the P3 wide color gamut and 1 billion colors. Both screens can also reach up to 500 nits of brightness, which is enough to be usable on a sunny day.

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget In use: Fast and light

Both the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Airs handled my basic workflow without a sweat: juggling browsers with a ton of open tabs, Slack, Spotify, messaging apps and the Pixelmator photo editor. But that was no surprise, as the previous models were similarly zippy. Still, after testing the sluggish Zenbook A14 recently, it felt refreshing to be using laptops that seemed eager to get to work.

I couldn't actually feel a difference with the jump to the M4 chip, but according to the Geekbench 6 benchmark, it’s 19.5 percent faster than the M3 for single-threaded tasks, and 21 percent faster for multi-threaded tasks. That's a typical incremental jump for CPU improvements, so I won't knock Apple too much there. The M4's GPU gains were far less impressive, scoring just 6 percent higher than the M3 in the 3DMark Wildlife Extreme benchmark and 16.3 percent better in the Geekbench GPU test.

Geekbench 6 CPU

Geekbench 6 GPU

Cinebench 2024

Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (M4, 2025)

3,784/14,745

36,273

172/660 GPU: 3,465

Apple MacBook Air 15-inch (M4, 2025)

3,874/14,873

36,131

171/748 GPU: 3897

Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (M3, 2024)

3,190/12,102

30,561

N/A

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch (M4, 2024)

3,797/14,571

37,869

172/979 GPU: 3770

Surface Laptop 7 (Snapdragon X Elite)

2,797/14,400

19,963

123/969 GPU N/A

You likely won't be doing much serious creative work on the MacBook Air, especially since there's no fan to cool things down. But you can still squeeze out a bit of performance in a pinch. I was able to transcode a 4K clip to 1080p in 27 seconds using the M4's CPU in Handbrake, while using the GPU took just 17 seconds. In comparison, the Dell XPS 13 Copilot+ system took 32 seconds with its CPU and 24 seconds with its GPU.

The graphically intense Lies of P ran at a smooth 60 fps in 1080p with high settings. That was also true of the M3 MacBook Air, but this time around the performance seemed a bit more consistent. While I'd never recommend buying a MacBook Air with gaming in mind, it's nice that it can handle a bit of playtime, at least.

While jumping between the 13-inch and 15-inch models, I found a lot to like about them both. The smaller one is definitely easier to travel with, but I also loved the immersive screen on the 15-inch. Ultimately, choosing between them comes down to what's most important to you.

Similarly, the leap to a 12-megapixel Center Stage camera isn't exactly Earth-shattering, but I appreciated having a slightly better picture during video calls. I typically turn off the actual Center Stage feature on Macs, but I'm sure some will appreciate its ability to track you around a room. The new camera also supports Desk View, which projects a slightly skewed view of the area directly in front of the MacBook Air.

As for battery life, both MacBook Air models lasted for more than 18 hours while playing an HD video. The 13-inch Air lasted for 18 hours and 15 minutes, while the 15-inch notebook went for 18 hours and 23 minutes.

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget How can Apple improve the MacBook Air?

As much as I love the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air, there are still plenty of ways Apple can refine them down the line. As I mentioned above, it'd be great to have higher refresh rate displays, which makes scrolling through documents far easier on your eyes. And while I don't need Apple to go all-out with ports, it'd be nice to have at least one USB-C connection on the right side of the Air to allow for easier charging. Right now, you're stuck with a MagSafe charging port and two USB-C connections on the left side.

Of course, I don't really expect Apple to actually deliver those upgrades anytime soon. I'd bet the company would nudge more demanding users to the $1,599 14-inch MacBook Pro, which has a ton of ports and a high refresh rate ProMotion screen. Still, a geek can dream.

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget Should you buy the M4 MacBook Air?

If you can't tell by now, I think the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air are the ideal ultraportables for most people. So sure, if you're in the market for a sleek laptop, they're worth considering. And if you're a Windows user who's hesitant to make the jump, I'd recommend trying an Air for a while. It's not that hard to learn the basics of macOS, and if you're not satisfied you can always return it (just be sure to double-check retailer return policies).

While I'd bet most users would be fine with the base $999 13-inch MacBook Air with 256GB of storage, it may be worth jumping up to the $1,199 model with a 10-core GPU and 512GB SSD if you plan to do light media work. Or just jump straight to the $1,199 15-inch model, which comes with a 10-core GPU. 

As usual, I'd also recommend avoiding paying Apple's absurd upgrade fees for components. If you're considering spending $400 more for 32GB of RAM, you should probably be considering a MacBook Pro instead. If you're looking to save some cash, several retailers are still selling the M2 MacBook Air at a steep discount of $700. Even though it's an older chip, that laptop could still serve most users well for several years (just make sure you're getting 16GB of RAM).

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget Wrap-up

Once again, the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air are basically everything we want from ultraportable notebooks. They’re zippy, wonderfully light and can last well beyond a full day of work. While the M4 chip isn’t a transformative upgrade, it helps Apple keep pace with evolving PC notebook chips. And now that the MacBook Air starts at $999, even Windows users should consider making the jump.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/apple-macbook-air-m4-13-inch-and-15-inch-review-minimal-upgrades-at-a-much-better-price-130002570.html?src=rss

Among the slew of Apple announced news from the previous few weeks is a refreshed MacBook Air. The laptop still comes in 13- and 15-inch sizes, starts with 16GB of RAM and offers up to 18 hours of battery life. The big spec bump here is the new M4 chipset, and that's paired with a $100 price cut; the base model starts at $999. MacBook Air pre-orders are open now, and the notebook will be widely available starting March 12. Here's everything you need to know about the M4 MacBook Air.

Apart from the new pricing, the marquee upgrade is the M4 chip. Although it isn't a massive leap over the M3, it still makes the 2025 MacBook Air up to twice as fast as the M1 model. (You know it's less than a generational breakthrough if Apple's comparing it to its first in-house silicon from 2020.) The M4 silicon in this model has a 10-core CPU and up to a 10-core GPU.

The MacBook Air still starts with 16GB of RAM, but the top-tier configurations support up to 32GB — an increase from a maximum of 24GB in the M3 model. When combined with the faster processor, you should see a noticeable speed boost when upgrading from an M1 or (especially) an older Intel MacBook.

In a welcome change for those whose laptop does double duty as a desktop PC, you can now connect it to two external displays while still using the built-in one. Last year's model only supported two with the MacBook lid closed or one with it open.

The new MacBook Air also adds Center Stage, Apple's auto-centering camera feature, for the first time in the lineup. It's paired with a 12MP camera, which should make your video calls and selfies look much sharper.

The last big upgrade is a cosmetic one. It now ships in sky blue, a light metallic color also found in the iPad Air and AirPods Max. It joins the carryovers midnight, starlight and silver.

Elsewhere, it still supports Apple Intelligence (if you're into that), runs macOS Sequoia and has a pair of Thunderbolt / USB 4 ports.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/how-to-pre-order-the-new-apple-macbook-air-m4-140559026.html?src=rss

Apple announced a number of new products recently, despite its last on-stage event being held last September. On the iPad side of things, both the entry-level iPad and the iPad Air received updates. The new base iPad runs on an upgraded A16 chipset, comes with double the previous amount of storage and is now considered to have an 11-inch display (the previous version sat at 10.9 inches). The new iPad Air models still come in 11- and 13-inch sizes, but are powered by M3 processors. iPad pre-orders are open now, and they will be widely available on March 12. Here's everything you need to know about the new iPad and the iPad Air M3.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/tablets/heres-how-to-pre-order-the-new-apple-ipad-and-ipad-air-m3-143643261.html?src=rss

Replacing a smartphone every two years is partially why billions of phones go into landfills each year. If stacked flat atop one another, that many handsets would reach farther than the ISS. But we’ve become accustomed to that 24-month time frame because wireless carriers often push an upgrade on biennial contracts, and many smaller phone makers only offer software support for two years. But now, with longer software commitments from major manufacturers, along with growing right-to-repair legislation, many newer phones can stay in our pockets for closer to seven trips around the sun. Here’s how you can extend the lifespan of your smartphone and avoid shelling out hundreds before it’s absolutely necessary.

How to make your smartphone last longer Amy Skorheim for Engadget Use a case

It’s a flashy move to carry a naked phone around, but the chances of a handset making it through a tumble go up dramatically when you employ extra protection. We recommend a few in our guide to iPhone cases. In my family, we’ve been happy with Mous cases. Though we’ve never subjected our phones to the brutality seen in the company’s ads, I can say that these cases have seen my partner’s aging Samsung Galaxy through some pretty gnarly spills and I credit the cases for getting my iPhone 11 to 2025 in working condition.

Take care of the built-in battery (or use a power bank)

Since a phone’s battery is often the first thing to show signs of age, it’s worth it to follow recommendations for extending its lifespan. Lithium-ion batteries don’t perform well in heat and you should avoid charging them if it’s hotter than 95 degrees — doing so can degrade the battery quickly and even cause them to malfunction. They’ll tolerate cold weather better, but can get sluggish when things get too chilly.

If you’re storing a phone for a while, it’s best to do so with the battery at half charge, rather than full or empty. In fact, Li-ion cells last longer when they spend less time being either completely discharged or full — that’s why battery optimization features in iPhones and Pixel phones delay overnight charging to 100 percent until about an hour before you typically grab your mobile. And while it’s sometimes necessary to charge a battery quickly, a slower charging method when speed isn’t critical will put less stress on the ionic components and help extend the cell’s life.

But over time, any battery will eventually wear down. The cell powering my iPhone 11 can make it through a typical day, but if I’m traveling, relying heavily on navigation or using the phone as a hotspot, it’ll need a top-off before bedtime. I have a slew of them on hand after testing for our best power banks guide and the two I grab most often are the Nimble Champ Pro, because it’s crazy fast and the Anker Prime because it’s massive and I know it’ll always have a charge to lend.

If you really want to give your phone a new lease on life, a new internal battery could be the ticket. For Pixel phones, you can go through Google’s official channel for either a walk-in or mail-in repair, you can look for an authorized repair partner or you can pick the DIY route with iFixit’s Pixel repair kits and instructions.

For iPhones, you can start with Apple’s official page, go through Best Buy or other authorized third-parties, or try iFixit’s methods. Samsung also has an in-house option but both iFixit and Best Buy ended their repair relationships with Samsung in 2024. Depending where you go and the model of your phone, the price for a new battery and installation will likely run you between $60 and $150 — still far less than ditching your handset for something brand new.

Clean up your phone’s storage

Most advice on how to declutter your phone and make it run faster centers on one thing: freeing up space. Your phone’s OS will likely have suggestions for clearing up storage space, like automatically offloading unused apps or deleting year-old messages. You can also do things manually by deleting any apps you don’t use. Next, consider the photos and videos you’re storing locally and either opt to pay for cloud storage or transfer the files to a computer or an external backup device. You can also consider getting rid of any music and movies you may have downloaded for offline use, and deleting old messages and large attachments. A good rule is to keep your storage at around 80 percent capacity. Once you’ve deleted and transferred what you can, restart your phone to give it a chance to clear up its temporary memory.

Why you can (and should) extend the life of your smartphone Photo by Sam Rutherford/Engadget

The e-waste stream grows each year and doesn't do great things for human or planetary health. Smartphone companies are offering better and more consistent trade-in deals, but even some electronic recycling has its faults. Simply hanging onto a device instead of opting for a new one is the most efficient way of cutting back on a phone's environmental impact — plus it'll save you money.  

While every giant phone maker would like you to believe that upgrading annually is critical, it’s worth noting that new generations of phones often bear strong resemblance to the prior year’s model. Engadget editors see this time and again with the countless smartphones they review — there’s a new button, a few new AI tricks, but the technology generally doesn’t leap forward each year to create something wildly different than what came before.

With only minor hardware upgrades, the more exciting new features come via over-the-air software updates. Starting with the release of the Pixel 8 in 2023, Google promised security and software updates for a full seven years. So those who buy a Pixel 9 in 2025 could still be using the same phone in 2032. Samsung’s Galaxy S25 from this January has the same length of promised support. Apple hasn’t made the same pledge, but when the launch of iOS 18 last year cut support for the iPhone 8 and iPhone X, both models had enjoyed around seven years of updates from launch.

When Apple launched the iPhone 15, the company doubled its estimation for the handset’s battery life saying a handset should retain 80 percent of the original full charge after 1,000 cycles. And Apple said the placement of the larger battery in the iPhone 16 makes replacing it easier. Overall, battery technology has improved in capacity over the years, but longevity hasn’t gone up across the board, as a study by PhoneArena makes clear.

More advancements in battery life spans may be on the horizon particularly as the EV industry grows, which also relies on lithium-ion cells. For now, declining battery health is usually the most noticeable issue affecting older phones. In 2023, the European Council of the European Union adopted new guidelines for battery-powered devices, which includes a mandate to allow consumers to “easily remove and replace” batteries. That won’t go into effect until 2027, and there will be plenty of interpretation as to what “easily” means. But EU mandates are what made Apple finally ditch Lightning ports on iPhones in favor of USB-C, so this could eventually be a step towards (once again) having smartphones with swappable batteries.

Even in the US, legislation could compel companies to make repair a better option. Right-to-repair bills were passed in 2022 in New York, Minnesota and other states. California has the strongest rule, and it even garnered Apple’s support. And Google has voiced its support for Oregon’s law. Some of these laws have already gone into effect, and will require manufacturers to do things like providing repair tools and documentation, and selling components for a number of years after the last new model for higher priced devices.

Currently, a number of phones have decent repairability scores, according to the online repair community iFixit (The FairPhone 5 gets the highest marks.) It even appears California’s law is having an impact, considering that iFixit gave the iPhone 14 a repair score of 4, but the iPhone 15 and 16 gets a 7. Unfortunately, the scores for Google’s Pixel 9 phones went down compared to previous models. Until more companies start making it easier to fix things ourselves, authorized repair is an option, while self-repair remains an option for the more industrious.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/how-to-make-your-smartphone-last-longer-120014817.html?src=rss

Ford says it's done sending out all the complimentary NACS adapters that 140,000 EV customers in the US had reserved. The automaker announced in 2023 that it was working with Tesla to give Ford EV owners access to tens of thousands of Superchargers across the US and Canada. In 2024, Ford's EVs became the first non-Tesla vehicles to be able to access Superchargers. However, since Ford EVs come with Combined Charging System (CCS) ports, they need North American Charging System adapters to be able to plug into Supercharger stations. 

The automaker gave new and current members of it BlueOval Charge Network — in other words, everyone who purchased it EVs — complimentary NACS adapters until June 30, 2024. Now, it has finished sending out the free adapters to everyone who asked for it. Those who need one will have to purchase the Ford Fast Charging Adapter, which "unlocks access to a vast network of DC fast charging stations using the North American Charging Standard (NACS)," for $200. Ford was planning to make the switch to built-in NACS ports for this year's EV models, but it's now unclear if that will happen, seeing as the 2025 model Mustang Mach-E still comes with a CCS port. 

Ford has also announced that its BlueOval Charge Network now includes 180,000 chargers at more than 50,000 locations, which translates to a 40 percent increase from the beginning of 2024. Like other automakers making the switch to electric, Ford is making an effort to expand charging availability. The hope is that wider access to chargers can help assuage range anxiety and encourage more people to buy electric. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/ford-says-its-done-sending-out-all-its-complimentary-nacs-charging-adapters-120020255.html?src=rss

The Justice Department said in a filing that Google will have to break up its network of myriad, overlapping businesses and services, upholding the previous administration’s proposal.

The DOJ reiterated Google will have to sell the Chrome browser — saying, last year, that selling off Chrome “will permanently stop Google’s control of this critical search access point and allow rival search engines the ability to access the browser that for many users is a gateway to the internet.”

Google is likely to file its own alternate remedies, of course. In a December filing, the company said the Justice Department’s original remedies went “overboard” and reflected an “interventionist agenda.”

But Google is huge, and the DOJ is trying to grasp how its parts intermingle and make it less monopolistic. It dropped a Biden-era proposal requiring Google to sell AI startup stakes. Instead, Google must now notify officials before making AI investments. Early 2025 reports say Google has thrown another billion dollars at Anthropic.

The company gave funds to both Trump’s presidential campaign and his inauguration — so it might be frustrated its donations aren’t working.

— Mat Smith

Get this delivered directly to your inbox. Subscribe right here!

The biggest tech stories you missed

• Elon Musk says a ‘massive cyberattack’ is to blame for X being down

• The Last of Us season two promises a lot more action alongside devastating drama

• Everything announced at MWC 2025: Samsung, Nothing, Lenovo, Xiaomi and more tech news

Watch the predictably cinematic 10-minute trailer for Death Stranding 2 My feels! Engadget

Death Stranding 2: On the Beach is coming to PlayStation 5 on June 26. At SXSW, creator Hideo Kojima and his Kojima Productions dropped a 10-minute trailer. The trailer reveals Death Stranding 2 takes place 11 months after the creation of the United Cities of America. As previous glimpses have shown, there are familiar Hollywood faces, new stars, new creepy adversaries and AOT-style giants to fell.

Continue reading.

Apple’s smarter, more personal Siri gets delayed further  New features are taking longer to complete than expected.

Apple is delaying its updated version of Siri that understands personal context and can act inside apps, according to a statement published at Daring Fireball. The company says upgraded Siri features will roll out “in the coming year.” Yeah, a little vague.

A revamped, more powerful Siri was a core part of Apple’s original pitch for Apple Intelligence. Way back when the company first detailed its plans, it claimed Siri would not only understand what’s happening on your phone but also be able to take action in apps for you. It teased some agentic features, as teased by Amazon’s upgraded Alexa and even Rabbit’s AI assistant R1, which is only just warming up to delivering on those capabilities.

Continue reading.

iPad Air M3 review It's a modest update that's still easy to recommend. Engadget

The iPad Air once again hits the sweet spot in Apple’s tablet lineup, offering a lot of additional features over the basic iPad while keeping the price down. It’s the most affordable large-screen iPad, the chip is powerful and it’s better in every way to the base iPad.

Continue reading.

Would you rent a PS5? Sony is using a third-party partner to offer leased consoles in the UK.

We’re over four years into the current generation of consoles (which is probably past the halfway point), but perhaps not everyone has a PS5. Sony has teamed up with a leasing company called Raylo to offer a PS5 rental service in the UK via the country’s PlayStation Direct website.

Leases for the PS5 Digital Edition, the version with a disc drive and the PS5 Pro are available on 12-, 24- or 36-month agreements or a rolling monthly contract. The longer a term you lock in, the lower the monthly price. A 36-month agreement for a PS5 Digital Edition costs £11 (around $14) per month. A rolling contract for the PS5 Pro, however, will run you a whopping £35.59 (nearly $46) per month. At the end of that, you’d return the console, but hey, you’d be primed for the PS6 launch, possibly?

Continue reading.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/general/the-morning-after-engadget-newsletter-111535558.html?src=rss

TikTok may be back online and in app stores, but its future in the United States is still far from certain. President Donald Trump’s executive order delaying enforcement of the ban was only a temporary reprieve for the company.

While ByteDance was once resistant to the idea of selling TikTok’s US business, that seems to have changed since Trump took office. A ByteDance investor said early this year that striking a deal to keep TikTok in the US is “in everybody's interest." Officials in China also suggested they were “open” to a deal, according to The Wall Street Journal.

A number of people and companies have signaled some interest in TikTok. Trump himself has said he would like to see a “bidding war” for the app and that the US government should own a stake in the company. What an eventual deal may look like, though, is unclear. These are the offers we currently know about. On March 9, Trump said the administration was "dealing with four different groups" on a potential deal, though he didn't name names. 

Trump’s executive order gave the company 75 days to come to an agreement, though he has recently said he would "probably" extend the deadline if a deal isn't reached by April 5.

Oracle

NPR reported in January that Oracle was working with Trump Administration officials on “a plan to save TikTok that involves tapping software company Oracle and a group of outside investors to effectively take control of the app's global operations.” Under this arrangement, ByteDance “would retain a minority stake in the company” but Oracle would oversee “the app's algorithm, data collection and software updates.”

Headed up by Trump pal Larry Ellison, TikTok has an existing partnership with Oracle. The cloud company already hosts TikTok’s US user data and the company was a key part of TikTok’s original negotiations to remain operational in the US under a plan called Project Texas. (Those negotiations abruptly fell apart in 2022.)

Trump also previously signed off on a deal for Oracle and Walmart to acquire a 20 percent stake in TikTok in 2020, when the president tried to ban the app during his first term. That deal never materialized. Now, Trump’s position on Oracle is unclear. He told reporters that Oracle was not among the “many people” with whom he had discussed a deal for TikTok. (Ellison, notably, has been at the White House in recent days. He joined Trump and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for the announcement of the Stargate Project.)

Microsoft

Microsoft is reportedly also interested in playing a role in TikTok’s future, according to the same NPR story, which said Microsoft was among the “other potential investors” involved in the talks with Oracle. Trump seemingly confirmed this. When asked directly if Microsoft was interested in buying TikTok, Trump responded “I would say yes.”

As with Oracle, this isn’t the first time Microsoft has attempted to acquire the social media company. Microsoft was in talks to buy TikTok in 2020 and take over its US business, but the deal abruptly fell apart. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella later described it as “the strangest thing I’ve ever sort of worked on.”

Perplexity AI (and maybe the US government)

Just before TikTok briefly went offline, Perplexity AI threw its hat into the ring, offering a deal to ByteDance that “would “create a new entity combining Perplexity, TikTok US and New Capital Partners.”

Since then, Perplexity has reportedly tweaked its proposal. According to the Associated Press, the AI company floated a plan that calls for the “U.S. government to own up to half of that new structure once it makes an initial public offering of at least $300 billion.” Under this plan, ByteDance would keep a minority stake in the company and “would contribute TikTok’s U.S. business without the proprietary algorithm that fuels what users see on the app.”

Project Liberty

Another set of investors that’s proposed a bid to buy TikTok is a group known as Project Liberty. Led by investor Frank McCourt, it includes Kevin O’Leary of Shark Tank fame. The group initially came forward before the ban took effect.

In March, Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian announced that he was joining the Project Liberty bid to acquire TikTok's assets. "I'd love to see an app where users actually own their data and where creators have real control," he wrote in a short post on X that hinted at a potential tie-in with... the blockchain. "Imagine bringing all those users seamlessly onchain..." An accompanying video referenced the possibility of "decentralized distribution," but disn't offer details.

O’Leary previously told CNBC that deals involving a government stake may not comply with the law. “That 50/50 deal, I would love to work with Trump on, so would every other potential buyer ... But the problem with some of these ideas is they are inconsistent with the ruling of the Supreme Court,” he said. “I would love to do a deal, if the law provided for it, but I don’t have the luxury of breaching the order of Congress.” Later, he said that the deal "changes by the hour," writing on X that "it's clear to me now that we're going to have to do a dance between the original owners, the founders of ByteDance itself, and interpreting the law of what Congress and Supreme Court has upheld."

MrBeast

YouTuber MrBeast, also known as Jimmy Donaldson, joked on X about buying TikTok ahead of the initial ban. He later said that “so many billionaires” had reached out to him about making an offer that he was going to try to actually pull it off.

Okay fine, I’ll buy Tik Tok so it doesn’t get banned

— MrBeast (@MrBeast) January 14, 2025

At least one group has already confirmed his involvement, along with other “high-net-worth individuals” looking to make an “all-cash offer.” That group, led by employer.com founder Jesse Tinsley also reportedly includes Roblox CEO David Baszucki. According to Bloomberg, together they have put together “significantly” more than $20 billion for a bid, though it’s not clear how seriously their offer is being considered. Bloomberg noted that there’s also a possibility that MrBeast may attach himself to other bids.

What’s next?

So where does all this leave TikTok? For now, the company is still in limbo. Yes, it's available in the App Store and Google Play, but the app's service could be interrupted again if the company is unable to reach some kind of a deal. For now, though, it seems both the government and ByteDance are much more willing to negotiate than they have been in the past, though it's not at all clear what terms both sides may actually agree on.  

Update, March 10, 2025, 6:55PM ET: This story has been updated to add new statements from President Trump, as well as to add details about Reddit founder Alexis Ohanian joining the Project Liberty bid.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/what-will-happen-to-tiktok-a-look-at-the-potential-buyers-000110723.html?src=rss

Bluesky continues to beef up its video capabilities. The app’s latest update adds support for uploads of up to 3 minutes, a notable expansion from its previous limit of one minute. The change should give video creators on Bluesky much more flexibility in what they can post. It will also likely be appreciated by fans of Flashes, the new Bluesky-based photo and video app.

The update also brings some much needed inbox-management tools to Bluesky DMs, with the addition of a new “requests” section for incoming messages from users you don’t know. You’ll also now be able to reject incoming chats, which should help reduce the number of spammy DMs that have been flooding many users’ inboxes in recent weeks.

The latest Bluesky update rolled out as CEO Jay Graber appeared onstage at SXSW for a keynote about the growing decentralized social media platform, which has just under 33 million users. Graber, who was wearing a t-shirt emblazoned with a Latin slogan “mundus sine caesaribus” (a world without Caesars) — an apparent play on Mark Zuckerberg’s affinity for Roman Empire-inspired attire — spoke about why Bluesky is “billionaire-proof” compared with other apps.

Zuckerberg's shirt translates to "All Zuck or all nothing." Graber's says "A world with no Caesars." Screenshot via X

“If a billionaire came in and bought Bluesky or took it over, or I decided tomorrow to change things in a way that people really didn't like, then they could fork off and go on to another application,” she said. “That openness guarantees that there's always the ability to move to a new alternative, still using the same network. There's much less tolerance in the ecosystem for a very heavy-handed change.”

She also opened up about how Bluesky is thinking about its business model and generative AI. On the business side, she once again said the company is “exploring subscriptions” as well as paid “developer services” for those who build experiences on top of Bluesky. In a similar vein, she also said the company was considering how it could eventually turn some of its features, like moderation services or custom feeds, into a “marketplace” where the company may get a cut of potential transactions.

When it comes to large language models, she said the company was “working with some partners on developing a framework for user consent, for how they want their data to be used for generative AI.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/bluesky-adds-3-minute-video-uploads-and-inbox-management-features-220317950.html?src=rss

It took a few years of dealing with poorly optimized handheld PCs, but Windows Central reports Microsoft may finally be working on an Xbox handheld. The company could announce an Xbox-branded portable device as early as this year, though it sounds like it won't come from Microsoft directly.

Instead, the company is partnering with a PC maker already working in the gaming space to build a handheld, Windows Central writes. The device, codenamed "Keenan," will feature Xbox design elements, an "official Xbox guide button" and will likely run Windows 11. Given the clunky experience of navigating Windows on the handhelds you can buy today, the real hope is that Xbox's take will include a launcher or new way of using the desktop OS that's fit for a controller instead of a mouse. The big advantage SteamOS has over Windows is that you never have to interact with a desktop environment if you don't want to.

These rumored plans might line up with what Microsoft's VP of "Next Generation" Jason Ronald shared at an AMD and Lenovo event from CES 2025 called "The Future of Gaming Handhelds." According to The Verge, Ronald said that Microsoft wants to bring "the best of Xbox and Windows together." The company hopes to simplify Windows and make it using it more console-like for handhelds. "I think we’ll have a lot more to share later this year," Ronald said.

Phil Spencer, CEO of Microsoft Gaming, has expressed interest in handheld devices before and said the company was experimenting with prototypes. It seems like at least for now, though, Microsoft is borrowing Valve's approach and making a handheld-friendly version of its operating system available for other PC makers to use. 

That doesn't mean there won't be a first-party handheld in the future. Windows Central's report mentions that there's a successor to the Xbox Series X, new internet-connected controllers and an official Xbox gaming handheld, all tentatively slated for 2027.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/xbox/the-first-xbox-handheld-might-not-come-from-microsoft-220043843.html?src=rss

People are getting more pessimistic about their own financial outlook for the year ahead, according to the latest Survey of Consumer Expectations from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

More than a quarter of households surveyed are expecting their financial situation to deteriorate considerably in the coming year. A growing number expect to be spending more and believe it will get increasingly hard to access credit. Fewer Americans say they’re likely to quit their job voluntarily this year, partly because they expect unemployment to rise.

In economics, the consumer is not always right. Ben Harris, vice president and director of economic studies at Brookings said, take the last couple of years: By almost any measure, the economy has been strong.

“Unemployment has been historically low. The stock market is growing. Economic growth has been continuing,” he said. “We would have expected that people’s outlook, all in all, would be relatively positive.”

Instead, consumers have been feeling pretty negative. He said there’s been a real mismatch between sentiment and reality.

“Middle part of 2022, for example, people were just as down on the economy as they were during the great financial crisis, even though the economy in 2022 was doing so much better,” Harris said.

Consumers then were also saying one thing — that they were worried about the economy — and doing another — continuing to spend like they weren’t worried.

“Just because folks say they’re unhappy about the state of the economy, that doesn’t mean much,” said Justin Wolfers, an economics and public policy professor at the University of Michigan.

He said it’s important to distinguish between how people feel about “the economy” broadly and how they feel about what’s happening in their own lives.

“Because what folks are expert in is not the aggregates, GDP and the unemployment rate, but their own household economies,” he said.

In the last couple of years, when people said they were worried about the economy, Wolfers says they meant they were worried about the headlines of the national economy, not their own household economies.

But this latest survey from the New York Fed shows people are increasingly concerned about their own financial futures. Vicki Bogan, a professor of public policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University, said that is worth watching.

Because if people are worried about their own bills and job prospects?

“They’re less likely to spend … they’re more likely to save money. When they’re reducing their spending and saving more, what is it going to do? It’s going to reduce the demand for goods and services. When consumers reduce their demand for goods and services, business sales are going to decline,” she said.

Which is why, when consumer expectations fall, there’s always the possibility an economic slowdown could be coming.

As expected, China has launched its counteroffensive in the trade war. It has retaliated against U.S. tariffs, with additional levies on U.S. agricultural exports. For instance, Chinese buyers will pay a levy of 15% on U.S. chicken, wheat and corn, and 10% on soybeans, pork and fruit.

For agricultural products that are already on their way from the U.S. to China, nothing changes.

“Our understanding is that the product that’s already en route … that the additional duty would not be in effect for that product. That it would clear under the duties that were already in place,” said Joe Schuele with the U.S. Meat Export Federation.

But he said there is an immediate impact on the psychology of the market.

“Any time you inject additional costs or additional uncertainty, certainly suppliers have to look at … how much China will remain part of their sales, their export portfolio,” he said.

If you’re a U.S. producer of, say, corn or chickens and a buyer in China has already agreed to buy a certain amount from you at a certain price, what happens now depends on exactly what kind of deal you made.

“A lot of these contracts have clauses that are about unexpected trade policy changes,” said Jaya Wen, a professor of business and international economy at the Harvard Business School. “That will determine whether the buyer or the seller is paying the unexpected tariff or how they’re sharing that — is it 50/50, or 70/30?”

In the longer term, tariffs are likely to mean fewer exports, Wen said. And for some products, that will mean more supply on the domestic market.

“U.S. buyers of these goods are going to face relatively cheaper goods. But the problem is that U.S. demand is nowhere near large enough to compensate for the decline in Chinese demand,” she said.

Layer these tariffs on top of the others already affecting the agriculture industry, and, Wen said, the takeaway is that farmers will just make less money.

Perhaps like the loser of the proposed cage fight between Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg that's never, ever happening, X has been down and out for much of Monday. Down Detector saw a spike in outage reports from users between around 5:30 AM and 6:30AM ET. There were two more prolonged spikes, denoting more significant outages, later in the morning. Team Engadget has not been able to view tweets on X for the most part, save for a few brief moments when the service showed signed of life.

The platform's owner, Elon Musk, claimed that there was a "massive cyberattack against X" with either a "large, coordinated group and/or a country" behind the claimed assault. Musk didn't provide any evidence, but experts told NBC News that his assertions were plausible.

“It’s difficult to be certain, but given the pattern of three observed outages, a denial service attack targeting X’s infrastructure can’t be ruled out,” Isik Mater, director of research at NetBlocks, which tracks internet connectivity around the world, told the outlet. “It’s certainly one of the longest X/Twitter outages in our records.”

Musk later expanded on the explanation as part of an interview with Larry Kudlow on Fox Business. He told Kudlow that the massive cyberattack had "IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area." According to network services company Cloudflare, Ukraine is increasingly the source location for DDoS attacks. The company's recent DDoS threat report for Q4 2024 had Ukraine as the forth-largest source of DDoSes, behind only Singapore, Hong Kong and Indonesia.

This isn't the first time that Musk has blamed a major attack for X's technical issues. He did the same thing last year when when he held a livestreamed audio chat with President Donald Trump last year and the broadcast wasn't working.

Update, March 10, 5:13PM ET: This story was updated after publish to include Elon Musk's comments about the attack having IP addresses originating in "the Ukraine are," along with some historical detail on DDoS prevelance in the country.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/elon-musk-says-a-massive-cyberattack-is-to-blame-for-x-being-down-184148605.html?src=rss

There’s not much left of 17126 Avenida de la Herradura in the Pacific Palisades‘ Highlands neighborhood. A charred file cabinet a few feet from where the front door probably was. Some blackened cans of paint strewn about what was likely the front yard. Five neighboring homes on the cul-de-sac look similarly obliterated.

But at the end of the street, there’s still an ocean view.

“This is the first publicly listed and closed property in the Palisades,” said Richard Schulman, standing outside what used to be a 2500 square foot ranch house. “This closed for $1.2 million.”

Schulman listed the property on January 15, barely a week after the fires started. It closed in late February.

If you’re wondering how in the world a lot with 9,900 square feet of rubble fetches over a million dollars? It’s the Palisades.

“This is one of the most beautiful places to live in the world,” said Schulman. “You’re in a totally secluded part of LA, but you’re still in the in the city.”

Before the fires, Schulman estimates the property could have sold for upwards of $2.5 million. He listed the property for $999,000, based off a rough calculation of the value of the underlying land. But it’s not like there were other burned down comps he could find on Zillow.

“This hasn’t been done before here, so we’re trying to guess along the way and try to get the best answer,” said Schulman, who has worked in West Los Angeles real estate for 21 years. While he’s completed difficult sales before, including fire-damaged properties, he had never been involved in selling a property quite like this.

Schulman settled on a price he thought would drum up interest. But he wasn’t sure exactly how much demand there would actually be after the fires.

Terri Bromberg, the seller, also had her doubts.

“I couldn’t imagine anybody wanting to buy a completely destroyed, burned up property,” said Bromberg.

Bromberg, 69, is an artist and associate professor at Santa Monica College. She lived at the Herradura property for the past 20 years, the last few with her daughter Rosie Galanis and son-in-law Kenneth.

While Bromberg was at work when the fires came, Rosie and Kenneth had to wait hours to make their escape. Abandoned cars were blocking the only exit route.

At first, Bromberg wanted to rebuild. When she told her daughter she was looking into contractors, Rosie started crying.

“When she brought that up I just broke down and I was like, ‘We go back and rebuild for what? For this to happen again?'” said Galanis.

That $999,000 listing price meant Bromberg would likely be selling the home for less than the $1.5 million she and her late husband paid for it 20 years ago. Even with insurance, Bromberg would be taking a financial hit.

But she had made her mind up that she was going to relocate. Within a week, she had made a successful bid on a new home in Santa Monica. Selling the Palisades property for whatever it was worth would hopefully help restore some of the savings she had to deplete for the new house.

“Our decision was mostly an emotional one,” said Bromberg. “We don’t want to live back there again, we want to relocate.”

Realtor Richard Schulman posted 17126 Herradura on the MLS with pictures of the house before the fires. He knew the pool of buyers would be mostly wealthy developers and investors offering all cash, but didn’t know how deep the pool would be.

“We had over 60 inquiries,” said Schulman. “We had a stack of offers. I think we had six offers over the list price.”

Because access to the Palisades was restricted, all of those offers came without buyers seeing the actual property.

Joe Solamany is the agent who represented the winning bidder, an LA-based investor who declined to be interviewed.

“We did a lot with Google Street view, we did a lot of other stuff,” said Solamany.

Solomany’s client was able to see the property during a 15-day escrow. The plan is to build a new house that the investor can either sell or eventually move into, although it may be a while before construction starts.

Investors like the one Solamany represents are betting that in five to seven years, demand to live in the Palisades will be stronger than before the fires. They believe new fire-hardened homes and infrastructure will convince potential buyers it’s less risky now.

“Because this risk was there before and if you even go back to other places, that in in the past, they had fire or what have you, after a while, people start going back,” said Solamany.

As a condition of the sale, Solamany’s client has accepted responsibility for debris removal from the property. The seller Bromberg will also have a few weeks after the closing date to recover any personal items from the property that may still be there, although her visits so far haven’t yielded much.

Schulman already has three other Palisades listings, including a townhome that was part of a larger complex completely destroyed by the  fires. It looks like a bomb got dropped on the property.

The asking price: $750,000.

“It’s a dream of what this will be in the future,” said Schulman. “What you’re buying is the this view of this hillside here and the trees here, and how this is going to look when it’s done.”

Schulman said he’s already got plenty of interested buyers eager to get into the Palisades for less than a million.

The current upheaval in federal government spending cuts isn’t just a bureaucratic headache in Washington — it has ripple effects felt far beyond the nation’s capital. For people in rural areas, layoffs have already impacted health care. And proposed federal funding cuts might have an even greater impact. That’s because many rural communities rely on federal funding to keep the doors of hospitals and clinics open.

Last fall, Bobbie Nicoliadis was on the once-a-week bus that travels from Christmas Valley to La Pine, Oregon, through the outback. The regular riders one this bus are close-knit. “This bus, we are like family,” Nicoliadis said. “It’s a great group of people.”

Nicoliadis was making the 130-mile round trip to get a blood draw at La Pine Community Health Center. On average, rural patients travel twice as far to health care. Bus driver Debbie Warren said it’s part of rural living.

“Doctor’s appointments are a long ways away, but there’s peace and quiet. You can see the antelope play,” she said.

This weekly bus service is reliant on government funding. It’s just one of many health services that could disappear with federal cuts. Rural community health clinics are also feeling threatened.

One clinic that relies on federal funding is Asher Community Health Center in Fossil, Oregon. Fossil is a town of less than 500 people, situated in the high desert. It’s so remote the Census Bureau doesn’t even categorize it as rural, but rather “frontier land.”

Asher Community Health is the only provider in this area, serving 1,200 patients a year. CEO Teresa Hunt said that funding is essential.

“Without the federal money for being a federally qualified health center, there’s no way that we’ll be here,” Hunt said. 

If the clinic loses funding and closes, its patients will have to drive more than three hours over winding mountain passes to get care. “It would be devastating for the people that live here,” said Hunt.

Federally qualified health centers are a key part of rural health care, especially for low-income people. 

“We’re designed to take care of the underserved, we’re the primary care safety net for a community,” said K.C. Bolton, CEO of Aviva Health. Aviva is a community health clinic in rural Douglas County, Oregon. It serves about 18,000 patients a year with the help of federal funding. 

Last month, Bolton started worrying he might not have access to federal service area competition grants that were already promised to the clinic. He tried to withdraw the remaining balance.

Apparently, he wasn’t the only one. The federal portal from the Health Resources and Services Administration crashed.

“Think of it kind of like a run on the bank. Everyone’s trying to draw off the system and overloaded the system,” said Bolton. “We’re all thinking the same thing. Let’s get ahead of this.”

Bolton was eventually able to withdraw the $3 million of grant funding early. 

That grant represents about 8% of Aviva Health’s annual budget. Meanwhile, Bolton is even more worried about possible cuts to Medicaid, which covers more than half of Aviva’s patients. “We’re kind of like the ER for outpatient care. We won’t turn folks away based on their ability to pay,” said Bolton.

Nationally, about 47% of children in rural areas use Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Program.

The Republican-backed congressional budget resolution proposed $880 billion in health service cuts over 10 years, including Medicaid.  

Carrie Cochran-McClain, chief policy officer at the National Rural Health Association said that already strapped rural clinics will feel these proposed cuts deeply.

“These are facilities that literally have zero days cash on hand to operate.”

Cochran-McClain said rural health care providers are already scrambling, trying to get federal employees on the phone. She said cuts to federally staffed clinics like the Department of Veterans Affairs and Indian Health Services could shift pressure elsewhere. And in rural areas, community health clinics will have to pick up the slack.

“Those costs have to go somewhere. And frequently they end up being shifted to other parts of our health care system, which then, in turn, kind of raises costs across the board, which is kind of a never-ending spiral,” Cochran-McClain said.

That could mean that federal funding uncertainties threaten to spiral rural health care facilities out of existence altogether.

It’s only Monday, and already Tesla’s not having a great week. Again.

That’s been a theme pretty much all year. The electric vehicle giant’s stock price has nearly been cut in half after it reached an all-time high in mid-December. Now it’s sitting right about where it was in November, meaning it’s lost just about all its post-presidential election hype.

This isn’t an EV market problem. It’s an Elon Musk problem, said climate economist Gernot Wagner at Columbia Business School.

“What’s happening here, you can probably explain through the politics and the optics,” said Wagner. 

Wagner said Tesla stock exploded after the November election because of Elon Musk’s proximity to President Donald Trump.

“That proximity has not turned into Tesla sales, at least not yet, and maybe never,” said Wagner. 

So EV drivers are buying other cars. Equity strategist Seth Goldstein at Morningstar Research said that’s not just because of politics.

“We’re seeing increased competition,” said Goldstein. “Other automakers are now offering comparable long-range vehicles at a similar price point.”

On top of all that, the Trump administration has brought with it some bad news for a huge piece of Tesla’s business.  

“Tesla has one less very serious revenue source, which is selling credits,” said Gil Tal, the director of the Electric Vehicle Research Center at University of California, Davis. 

Tal said Tesla — one of the cleanest automakers — sells carbon credits to its more pollutive colleagues so they can meet state regulations and those imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA regulation is now in question.

“By canceling the EPA regulation and so on, they’re just directly canceling this market,” said Tal. 

That would be bad news, when credits make up more than a third of Tesla’s business.

Moreover, Tesla’s sales are cratering in Europe, and there have been protests against the company here and abroad because of Elon Musk’s political involvements.

This summer is going to be a major test for Tesla’s future, said Jessica Caldwell with Edmunds.

“People that buy stock in Tesla, it’s almost like a dream as to what is going to happen. Is Tesla going to dominate the robotaxi field? Because we know who does that is going to be an extremely profitable company,” said Caldwell. 

Whether Tesla dominates the field will depend on whether it makes good on its promise to have autonomous vehicles on the road starting in June.

Apple is planning to dramatically rethink the look and feel of its operating systems with the introduction of the next version of iOS, iPadOS and macOS, according to Bloomberg.

The redesign is meant to make using the company's software more consistent, and will impact "the style of icons, menus, apps, windows and system buttons," Bloomberg writes. The changes may take loose inspiration from visionOS, the mixed-reality operating system of the Vision Pro. The headset featured a slightly different style from Apple's other software, with a focus on translucency, floating interface elements and rounded app icons.

As Bloomberg notes, Apple hasn't dramatically rethought the look of any of its software since iOS 7 and macOS Big Sur, so tweaks would be notable. When it was released in 2013, iOS 7 was the first version of the iPhone's operating system overseen by former Chief Design Officer Jony Ive, and when Big Sur came out in 2020, it was the first version of macOS to run iPad apps and work on Apple's custom silicon. There don't seem to be any equally big shifts paired with iOS 19, iPadOS 19 and macOS 16, beyond the company's ongoing work on Apple Intelligence, which isn't available in all of its apps yet.

Apple Intelligence was introduced alongside iOS 18 and includes a host of new AI-powered features for working with audio, images and text, on top of a revamped version of Siri that can use apps for you. Most of those features shipped — though not at launch — save for the new Siri, which Apple recently announced will now be available "in the coming year."

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/apple-is-reportedly-planning-a-major-redesign-for-ios-19-and-macos-16-202804091.html?src=rss

Go to a profile of any celebrity on Wikipedia and it's quite possible that you'll be met with a terrible photo of them. Such images are often old or out of focus, perhaps captured candidly on a smartphone at a public event. A group of volunteer photographers has set out to fix that, as 404 Media reports.

Any media uploaded to Wikipedia has to be made freely available for anyone to use. Given that professional photographers want to make money from their work, they don't tend to share their photos there.

Enter WikiPortraits, a team of amateur snappers who have been hitting up festivals, award ceremonies and other events to take Creative Commons-licensed shots of high-profile attendees. Some of the stars seem very happy to have a replacement headshot on their Wikipedia page, the first stop for many people to find out about that person.

One photographer, Jay Dixit, said Succession star Jeremy Strong was all too glad to pose for a new snap. "His publicist said no," Dixit recounted. "But Jeremy said, 'Wait, you’re from Wikipedia? For the love of God, please take down that photo. You’d be doing me a service.'"

The Wikimedia Foundation and donations are funding WikiPortraits' efforts, which you can read more about at 404 Media.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/volunteer-photographers-are-fixing-wikipedias-terrible-celebrity-headshots-194454358.html?src=rss